"panda" config and build doesn't work on panda ES at all

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:20:45PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   just for fun, i configured and built MLO and barebox.bin for the
> > panda, then tried to use that on a panda ES -- got no response
> > whatever from minicom.  i did verify that i could boot to barebox just
> > fine on a regular panda, though.
> >
> >   this is different from the case of a regular beagle and beagle xM,
> > for which the MLO and barebox.bin boot just fine on an xM, so there's
> > clearly a significant difference between those two panda variants as
> > far as barebox is concerned.  i haven't had any time to look at it in
> > more detail yet.
>
> We should add some information about that here:
>
> http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_panda
> http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=boards:texas_instruments_beagle
>
> So what variants of these boards are out there?
>
> Panda 'regular'
> Panda ES
> Beagle 'regular'
> Beagle xM
>
> Do these correspond somehow to the revisions printed on the board?
> I have a Beagle rev C3 and a Panda rev A1.

  i'll write something up and ask the beagle & panda lists to take a
look.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================