[PATCH v5 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: minimal driver support
Jon Hunter
jon-hunter at ti.com
Tue Jun 12 13:57:11 EDT 2012
On 06/12/2012 02:16 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:13:22, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>
>>> + gpmc_revision = (l >> 4) & 0xf;
>>
>> Why are you only storing the major part of the rev? Why not keep both parts?
>
> Does having minor revision add any value ?, at least as of now,
> I do not see any.
May be not but it does not hurt either.
>>> + dev_info(gpmc_dev, "GPMC revision %d.%d\n", gpmc_revision, l & 0x0f);
>>
>> Nit-pick, please add a mask and shift definition for the revision
>> register major and minor fields and use these above.
>
> Yes, right
Thanks
Jon
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list