[PATCH] gpio/samsung: Complain loudly if we don't know the SoC

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Mon Oct 17 17:07:47 EDT 2011


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> If we don't know the SoC type then we won't add any chips which is rather
> unfortunate as neither GPIO nor pinmux APIs will work, breaking lots of
> different subsystems. Logging at least provides a hint to the user as to
> what's gone wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Be Bolder!  May as well use WARN() and be really obnoxious.  :-)

g.

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index 8baa946..90455de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -2495,6 +2495,9 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
>                s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XA, 0, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS);
>                s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XB, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS, IRQ_GPIO2_NR_GROUPS);
>  #endif
> +       } else {
> +               pr_crit("Unknown SoC in gpio-samsung, no GPIOs added\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
>        }
>
>        return 0;
> --
> 1.7.6.3
>
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list