[PATCH 2/8] macb: detect hclk presence from platform data

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 13:08 Fri 11 Mar     , Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:47:57PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 08:54 Fri 11 Mar     , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > On 10:10 Thu 10 Mar     , Jamie Iles wrote:
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91
> > > > > +#define PCLK_NAME	"macb_clk"
> > > > > +#else /* CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 */
> > > > > +#define PCLK_NAME	"pclk"
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > 
> > > > we need change the clock name and avoid the ifdef
> > > > so this will be generic
> > > > 
> > > > nb I work on the switch to clkdev currently for avr32 and at91
> > > 
> > > This should be gone now.  Russell made the suggestion to have a fake clk 
> > > for hclk on AT91 so I think I've solved that now.  There's an updated 
> > > patch in my reply to Russell's message but essentially I'm using 
> > > at91_clock_associate() to turn "macb_pclk" into "hclk" and "pclk".  Does 
> > > this seem reasonable?
> > please do not use at91_clock_associate as I'm going to remove it as use static
> > clock as done on shmobile as example
> > so if it's a fake clock please as ochi_clk on 9g45
> 
> Ok, that's fine.  How about for the "macb_plk" though, won't that need 
> an at91_clock_associate() or is it OK to rename all of the macb_clk 
> definitions to have be called "pclk"?

Personnaly I prefer macb_clk but if Nico prefer pclk it's fine

Best Regards,
J.