[RFC PATCH] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler
mikpe at it.uu.se
Tue Mar 1 04:12:40 EST 2011
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:49:49AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:27:43PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > + asm volatile("1:\t.word %c3\n" \
> > > + ".pushsection __bug_table,\"a\"\n" \
> > > + "2:\t.word 1b, %c0\n" \
> > > + "\t.hword %c1, 0\n" \
> > > + "\t.org 2b+%c2\n" \
> > %c doesn't work on lots of versions of gcc, which is why we can't use
> > the generic bug support. There's no way to reliably generate constants
> > without many compiler versions spitting out a '#' before them.
> gcc 4.3.2:
> asm(".word %c0" : : "i" (0));
> .word #0
> which gas chokes on:
> /tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: bad expression
> /tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `0'
> So what this means is that it's impossible to generate constants in
> assembly with GCC targetting ARM without having them prefixed by '#',
> which in turn makes it impossible to use the generic BUG support.
> I reported this bug to gcc folk many years ago. I've no idea which
> version it has been fixed in or if it's even been fixed.
What's the gcc bugzilla bug number?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel