[RFC PATCH] ARM: Use generic BUG() handler
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Tue Mar 1 03:59:11 EST 2011
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:49:49AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:27:43PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> > + asm volatile("1:\t.word %c3\n" \
> > + ".pushsection __bug_table,\"a\"\n" \
> > + "2:\t.word 1b, %c0\n" \
> > + "\t.hword %c1, 0\n" \
> > + "\t.org 2b+%c2\n" \
>
> %c doesn't work on lots of versions of gcc, which is why we can't use
> the generic bug support. There's no way to reliably generate constants
> without many compiler versions spitting out a '#' before them.
gcc 4.3.2:
asm(".word %c0" : : "i" (0));
produces:
.word #0
which gas chokes on:
/tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: bad expression
/tmp/cc2hGOHd.s:12: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `0'
So what this means is that it's impossible to generate constants in
assembly with GCC targetting ARM without having them prefixed by '#',
which in turn makes it impossible to use the generic BUG support.
I reported this bug to gcc folk many years ago. I've no idea which
version it has been fixed in or if it's even been fixed.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list