a couple consistent misspellings that could be fixed

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Jun 26 11:28:21 PDT 2014

  being the pedant that i am, i notice the following widespread
misspellings in the barebox codebase:

* "existance" (should be existence)

  actually, not that widespread, only three, all comments so easy to

* "persistant" (should be persistent)

  this one is much uglier -- a couple dozen, including its use in
runnable code itself. just run:

  $ grep -r persistant *

to see what i mean.

  what's the policy for fixing a spelling error that spills over from
the comments into compilable code itself?



Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday

More information about the barebox mailing list