a couple consistent misspellings that could be fixed

[Sascha Hauer]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:28:21PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   being the pedant that i am, i notice the following widespread
> misspellings in the barebox codebase:
> 
> * "existance" (should be existence)
> 
>   actually, not that widespread, only three, all comments so easy to
> fix
> 
> * "persistant" (should be persistent)
> 
>   this one is much uglier -- a couple dozen, including its use in
> runnable code itself. just run:
> 
>   $ grep -r persistant *

Uh, quite a few.

> 
> to see what i mean.
> 
>   what's the policy for fixing a spelling error that spills over from
> the comments into compilable code itself?

You can fix them all in a single patch, no need to split it up. At least
not as long there's not a function which uses 'persistent' and
'persistant' as two different variables ;)

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |