should i expect trying to mount a cramfs fs to give me a segmentation fault?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Mon Dec 3 07:51:50 EST 2012
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> cramfs was present in barebox very early. I think in some places the
> implementation still assumes that the filesystem image is directly
> memory mapped. Probably we should investigate and either add a big
> warning somewhere or fix it.
ok, good to know ... i deleted my wiki page regarding barebox and
cramfs since it's clear i didn't understand it. only suggestion
would be to update this page:
http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=user:first_steps
so users don't trip over the same thing i did. onward ...
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the barebox
mailing list