should i expect trying to mount a cramfs fs to give me a segmentation fault?

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Mon Dec 3 07:51:50 EST 2012


On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

> cramfs was present in barebox very early. I think in some places the
> implementation still assumes that the filesystem image is directly
> memory mapped. Probably we should investigate and either add a big
> warning somewhere or fix it.

  ok, good to know ... i deleted my wiki page regarding barebox and
cramfs since it's clear i didn't understand it.  only suggestion
would be to update this page:

  http://wiki.barebox.org/doku.php?id=user:first_steps

so users don't trip over the same thing i did.  onward ...

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================



More information about the barebox mailing list