[PATCH] nvmet: make nvmet_wq unbound

[Sagi Grimberg]

On 06/05/2024 15:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:50:02AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> It doesn't have any better justification. I never really saw any other
>> justification
>> to add WQ_SYSFS to a (usually unbound) workqueue, than simply have
>> visibility
>> or ability to control it.
>>
>> What makes you think this is not harmless and useful?
> Because now we have to deal with users setting more or less insane
> parameters on the workqueue.
>

Isn't that an argument against WQ_SYSFS entirely?
I can drop it though, its not really important.