[PATCH] nvmet: make nvmet_wq unbound

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:05:13PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> What makes you think this is not harmless and useful?
>> Because now we have to deal with users setting more or less insane
>> parameters on the workqueue.
>>
>
> Isn't that an argument against WQ_SYSFS entirely?
> I can drop it though, its not really important.

Unless it's a workqueue where these settings explicitly should be user
tweakable: yes.