[PATCH] nvmet: make nvmet_wq unbound

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:50:02AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> It doesn't have any better justification. I never really saw any other 
> justification
> to add WQ_SYSFS to a (usually unbound) workqueue, than simply have 
> visibility
> or ability to control it.
>
> What makes you think this is not harmless and useful?

Because now we have to deal with users setting more or less insane
parameters on the workqueue.