patch

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:50 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:13:42AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Oh yeah, sorry. Messages with 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' headers but
> > without 'Re:' in the subject are considered suspicious because some
> 
> I see.  I wish it at least be more specific complaining.

Yeah, mailman sucks. It would be really useful to associate a specific
response with each of the 'offences' it considers to be suspicious, but
AFAICT you can't.

-- 
dwmw2