patch

[Roman Kagan]

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:13:42AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Oh yeah, sorry. Messages with 'In-Reply-To' or 'References' headers but
> without 'Re:' in the subject are considered suspicious because some

I see.  I wish it at least be more specific complaining.

> Neither of those is particularly relevant on a list which is as quiet as
> this one, so I suppose we could turn them off. Or we could just avoid
> doing it most of the time, and manually approve messages occasionally.

Whichever you like, I'm fine with either.

Sorry for bugging you so much this morning,
  Roman.