ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface)

[Vineet Gupta]

On 7/9/20 3:01 PM, Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha at sourceware.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>>> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now (expect some
>>>> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run
>>>
>>> No regressions in sysvipc tests !
>>
>> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4
>> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port
>> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for
>> shmctl)"
>>
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5
>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym
>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static
>> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen
>> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static
> 
> I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32.
> 
> Alistair

Thx for confirming !

>> Could it be due to recent TLS optimizations...
>>
>> | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out
>> | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block
>>