ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface)

Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat.com
Fri Jul 10 05:28:27 EDT 2020


* Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha:

> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha at sourceware.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> >> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now (expect some
>> >> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run
>> >
>> > No regressions in sysvipc tests !
>>
>> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4
>> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port
>> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for
>> shmctl)"
>>
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4
>> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5
>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym
>> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static
>> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen
>> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static
>
> I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32.

Did you rebuild from scratch?  After the libc.so/ld.so ABI changes that
went in recently, it could be the result of incomplete make
dependencies.

Thanks,
Florian




More information about the linux-snps-arc mailing list