ARC testsuite regressions (was Re: [PATCH v7.2 07/13] ARC: Linux Syscall Interface)

[Alistair Francis]

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:36 PM Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha
<libc-alpha at sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/9/20 2:13 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> >> Rebased ARC port on master and fired a build-many-glibcs <glibcs> now (expect some
> >> abilist updates). Will do a full testsuite run
> >
> > No regressions in sysvipc tests !
>
> But quite a few regressions. Baseline is ARC port off of upstream 81b1c8cbb5b4
> "(hurd: Simplify usleep timeout computation)" and failures below seen in ARC port
> off of today's master ffd178c651b8 "(sysv: linux: Add 64-bit time_t variant for
> shmctl)"
>
> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic
> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic2
> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic3
> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic4
> FAIL: dlfcn/tststatic5
> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym
> FAIL: elf/tst-libc_dlvsym-static
> FAIL: elf/tst-single_threaded-static-dlopen
> FAIL: elf/tst-tls9-static

I see the same recent-ish regressions for RV32.

Alistair

> ..
>
> Could it be due to recent TLS optimizations...
>
> | $ cat dlfcn/tststatic.out
> | .../build/libc.so.6: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block
>
> -Vineet