[PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO Board

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/11/2025 08:47, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> On 11/14/25 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/11/2025 08:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 11/14/25 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 05/11/2025 08:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 05/11/2025 07:57, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/5/25 15:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 06:13, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Radxa CM5 IO Board.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Link: https://dl.radxa.com/cm5/radxa_cm5_product_brief.pdf
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki at radxa.com>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong DCO chain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 7 +++++++
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NAK, you just stolen ownership of an already posted patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read "Changes in v6" and patches; my patches are not the same as v5.
>>>>>> Your reply is totally inappropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Inappropriate is taking authorship of someone's patch, because we all
>>>>> expect to preserve the original authorship. That's not only basic
>>>>> decency but actually a standard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Additionally, read Joseph's reply that he wants to continue the work:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMWSM7iHtAxewW4JkRqRsifVnccqeFviaCgeOyprKDr92FOurg@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> You clearly do not understand how to continue with someone's work.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is still a NAK.
>>>>
>>>> And I still wait for justification why you took authorship of this
>>>> patch, because to my eye you changed here nothing.
>>>>
>>>> So what did you change HERE that you think you are the author now?
>>>
>>> Changes in v6:
>>> (Patch 1/3)
>>> - Fix description; "Radxa CM5" is the correct name
>>
>> HERE, in this patch. Don't paste me hundreds of unrelated code. Write
>> concise and precise answers/comments.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/AE0735A6C797CCFF+10496d73-7c0a-4884-9561-24721305a24f@radxa.com/
> 
> | By the way, at some point I switched from "continuing your work" to
> | "recreating a new one based on my current work." The results of my
> | current work(*3) have changed significantly.

So next time I will take your patch, your code, say "I recreated it" and
submit under my authorship and for you it is fine?

Please take Joseph's patch instead. Read submitting patches doc to
understand which one more tag has to be added when sending somoene
else's work.

In the future, I sincerely suggest avoiding re-creating people's work
but building on top, because you just duplicate the effort.

Best regards,
Krzysztof