[PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO Board

[FUKAUMI Naoki]

On 11/14/25 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/11/2025 08:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 11/14/25 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2025 08:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 05/11/2025 07:57, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>> On 11/5/25 15:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 06:13, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Radxa CM5 IO Board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link: https://dl.radxa.com/cm5/radxa_cm5_product_brief.pdf
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki at radxa.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wrong DCO chain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 7 +++++++
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NAK, you just stolen ownership of an already posted patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Read "Changes in v6" and patches; my patches are not the same as v5.
>>>>> Your reply is totally inappropriate.
>>>>
>>>> Inappropriate is taking authorship of someone's patch, because we all
>>>> expect to preserve the original authorship. That's not only basic
>>>> decency but actually a standard.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, read Joseph's reply that he wants to continue the work:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMWSM7iHtAxewW4JkRqRsifVnccqeFviaCgeOyprKDr92FOurg@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>
>>>> You clearly do not understand how to continue with someone's work.
>>>>
>>>> It is still a NAK.
>>>
>>> And I still wait for justification why you took authorship of this
>>> patch, because to my eye you changed here nothing.
>>>
>>> So what did you change HERE that you think you are the author now?
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> (Patch 1/3)
>> - Fix description; "Radxa CM5" is the correct name
> 
> HERE, in this patch. Don't paste me hundreds of unrelated code. Write
> concise and precise answers/comments.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/AE0735A6C797CCFF+10496d73-7c0a-4884-9561-24721305a24f@radxa.com/

| By the way, at some point I switched from "continuing your work" to
| "recreating a new one based on my current work." The results of my
| current work(*3) have changed significantly.

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>