[PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO Board

[FUKAUMI Naoki]

On 11/14/25 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/11/2025 08:47, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>> On 11/14/25 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 14/11/2025 08:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/14/25 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 05/11/2025 08:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 07:57, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/5/25 15:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 06:13, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Radxa CM5 IO Board.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Link: https://dl.radxa.com/cm5/radxa_cm5_product_brief.pdf
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki at radxa.com>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wrong DCO chain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 7 +++++++
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NAK, you just stolen ownership of an already posted patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Read "Changes in v6" and patches; my patches are not the same as v5.
>>>>>>> Your reply is totally inappropriate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Inappropriate is taking authorship of someone's patch, because we all
>>>>>> expect to preserve the original authorship. That's not only basic
>>>>>> decency but actually a standard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally, read Joseph's reply that he wants to continue the work:
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMWSM7iHtAxewW4JkRqRsifVnccqeFviaCgeOyprKDr92FOurg@mail.gmail.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You clearly do not understand how to continue with someone's work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is still a NAK.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I still wait for justification why you took authorship of this
>>>>> patch, because to my eye you changed here nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what did you change HERE that you think you are the author now?
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> (Patch 1/3)
>>>> - Fix description; "Radxa CM5" is the correct name
>>>
>>> HERE, in this patch. Don't paste me hundreds of unrelated code. Write
>>> concise and precise answers/comments.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/AE0735A6C797CCFF+10496d73-7c0a-4884-9561-24721305a24f@radxa.com/
>>
>> | By the way, at some point I switched from "continuing your work" to
>> | "recreating a new one based on my current work." The results of my
>> | current work(*3) have changed significantly.
> 
> So next time I will take your patch, your code, say "I recreated it" and
> submit under my authorship and for you it is fine?

Regarding CM5 patches, I'm fine.

> Please take Joseph's patch instead. Read submitting patches doc to
> understand which one more tag has to be added when sending somoene
> else's work.
> 
> In the future, I sincerely suggest avoiding re-creating people's work
> but building on top, because you just duplicate the effort.

I understand that you don't understand how I made efforts to build my 
work on top of Joseph's patches.

Thank you for your attention.

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>