[PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add description for rk3588

[Sebastian Reichel]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:06:34PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:48:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > > Hello Rob,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:14:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:55:23 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > > > > Add "rockchip,rk3588-pwm" compatible string for PWM nodes found
> > > > > > > on a rk3588 platform.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel at collabora.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > No driver changes required.
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 1 +
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > > > > > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > > > > > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > > > > > This will change in the future.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is this a list of *new* warnings, or is the report (somewhat) orthogonal
> > > > > to the actual change and you just used the opportunity that someone
> > > > > touched the pwm-rockchip binding to point out that there is some cleanup
> > > > > to do?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hm, that gives me a 404.
> > > > 
> > > > This is an existing problem with the rv1108 binding.
> > > > The rk3588 does not have pwm interrupts.
> > > 
> > > Can somebody go and fix that, then?
> > 
> > I assume this will be taken care of with the rk3128 patchset, since
> > that is affected anyways:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/f5dd0ee4-d97e-d878-ffde-c06e9b233e38@gmail.com/
> 
> That patch is already acked and I've pulled it in, so better make it a
> separate patch.
> 
> The point I was trying to make is that somebody needs to fix this,
> otherwise the automated checks are not going to be useful. So saying
> things like "this is an existing problem and the new compatible is not
> affected" is not helpful.

The point I'm making is: I do not have that hardware. I only have
rk3588, which has no interrupts and I don't know anything about
rv1108.

Based on the driver and the bindings I would just remove the
interrupts from DT; but I can't do any testing beyond compile
testing.

-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20220928/c7680e6f/attachment.sig>