[PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add description for rk3588

[Johan Jonker]

On 9/28/22 15:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 03:06:34PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:48:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:16:01PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>>>> Hello Rob,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:14:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:55:23 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>>>>>> Add "rockchip,rk3588-pwm" compatible string for PWM nodes found
>>>>>>> on a rk3588 platform.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel at collabora.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> No driver changes required.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 1 +
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
>>>>>> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
>>>>>> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
>>>>>> This will change in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a list of *new* warnings, or is the report (somewhat) orthogonal
>>>>> to the actual change and you just used the opportunity that someone
>>>>> touched the pwm-rockchip binding to point out that there is some cleanup
>>>>> to do?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, that gives me a 404.
>>>>
>>>> This is an existing problem with the rv1108 binding.
>>>> The rk3588 does not have pwm interrupts.
>>>

I can provide DT and YAML changes, but I pass for changes to the currently to me unknown PWM framework and missing hardware.

Johan

>>
>> I assume this will be taken care of with the rk3128 patchset, since
>> that is affected anyways:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/f5dd0ee4-d97e-d878-ffde-c06e9b233e38@gmail.com/
> 
> That patch is already acked and I've pulled it in, so better make it a
> separate patch.
> 
> The point I was trying to make is that somebody needs to fix this,
> otherwise the automated checks are not going to be useful. So saying
> things like "this is an existing problem and the new compatible is not
> affected" is not helpful.
> 
> Thierry
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip