[PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Thu Oct 1 14:05:12 PDT 2015
On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/01, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>> > On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>> > > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>> > >> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>> > > The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks, so
>> > > should have no problem going through another tree.
>> > What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock
>> > patches as well?
>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings translation gets
>> optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get no good phase and thus
>> fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the system would stay running.
>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches and
>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-)
> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree.
> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches.
I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an
ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks.
Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts.
More information about the Linux-rockchip