[PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()
jh80.chung at samsung.com
Thu Oct 1 19:52:00 PDT 2015
On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 10/01, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks, so
>>>>> should have no problem going through another tree.
>>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock
>>>> patches as well?
>>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings translation gets
>>> optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get no good phase and thus
>>> fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the system would stay running.
>>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches and
>>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-)
>> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree.
>> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches.
> I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an
> ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks.
> Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts.
I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my repository.
Thanks for giving time! :)
> Kind regards
More information about the Linux-rockchip