[PATCH v2 3/8] mmc: core: Add mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()

Stephen Boyd sboyd at codeaurora.org
Thu Oct 1 10:35:54 PDT 2015

On 10/01, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
> > On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
> > >> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> > > The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks, so
> > > should have no problem going through another tree.
> > 
> > What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock
> > patches as well?
> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings translation gets 
> optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get no good phase and thus 
> fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the system would stay running.
> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches and 
> everything would stay together that would work even better :-)

If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree.
Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches.

Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list