[PATCH 01/27] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT6795

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/04/2023 12:25, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/04/23 10:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> On 14/04/2023 10:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 12/04/2023 13:27, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>>> Add a compatible string for MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795's display PWM
>>>>> block: this is the same as MT8173.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 4 +++-
>>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>>> index 0088bc8e7c54..153e146df7d4 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ properties:
>>>>>             - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
>>>>>             - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
>>>>>         - items:
>>>>> -          - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>>>> +          - enum:
>>>>> +              - mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm
>>>>> +              - mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>>>
>>>> This does not look correct. You do not add compatible, you replace
>>>> breaking all mt8167-disp-pwm. At least it looks like this from context.
>>>
>>> I thought the old semantic to be:
>>>
>>> 	"mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>>>
>>> and the new
>>>
>>> 	"mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm" or "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>>>
>>> . What am I missing?
>>
>> The new is ok for mt6795 but it is not valid for mt8167.
>>
> 
> Sorry, why is it not valid for MT8167?

Eh, above example did not help me, because it missed mt8173, but I see
now the context I missed. It's already a list of two compatibles, so the
patch is fine.

Best regards,
Krzysztof