[PATCH 01/27] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT6795

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 14/04/23 10:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 14/04/2023 10:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2023 13:27, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> Add a compatible string for MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795's display PWM
>>>> block: this is the same as MT8173.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 4 +++-
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>> index 0088bc8e7c54..153e146df7d4 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ properties:
>>>>             - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
>>>>             - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
>>>>         - items:
>>>> -          - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>>> +          - enum:
>>>> +              - mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm
>>>> +              - mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>>
>>> This does not look correct. You do not add compatible, you replace
>>> breaking all mt8167-disp-pwm. At least it looks like this from context.
>>
>> I thought the old semantic to be:
>>
>> 	"mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>>
>> and the new
>>
>> 	"mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm" or "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>>
>> . What am I missing?
> 
> The new is ok for mt6795 but it is not valid for mt8167.
> 

Sorry, why is it not valid for MT8167?

This is changing the doc from:

OLD:
       - items:
           - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
           - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
NEW:

       - items:
           - enum:
               - mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm
               - mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
           - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm

For me, that's totally valid, as the old semantic was:

compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm", "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm";

...and the new semantic is .. the same; this commit only *adds* the
possibility to get a

compatible = "mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm", "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm";

without breaking anything.

Regards,
Angelo