Yet More Patches
proski at gnu.org
Tue Mar 9 16:38:26 GMT 2004
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Russell King wrote:
> For this to happen, it needs to be thoroughly tested, which means I
> need to hear success reports.
I have tested it on Linux 2.6.4-rc2-bk5 (the latest snapshot).
One problem is that 01-debug.diff couldn't be applied to sa11xx_core.c
cleanly. Since I wasn't testing on ARM, I ignored the failure and applied
After I booted the patched kernel, I tested the CVS Orinoco driver. There
was one error message:
orinoco_cs: Unknown symbol pcmcia_report_error
This can be fixed by using cs_error instead. In fact, some standalone
drivers already use cs_error (HostAP), while others use
pcmcia_report_error() (linux-wlan-ng, atmelwlandriver).
Of the drivers in the kernel sources, only orinoco_cs.c uses
pcmcia_report_error(). It will need to be fixed in the kernel if
06-cardservices.diff is applied. Just remove orinoco_cs_error()
implementation and use cs_error() instead.
I'll fix orinoco_cs.c in CVS to use cs_error(). I hope it will be in the
kernel soon, but I cannot promise that it will be there before
06-cardservices.diff is applied.
Actually, I think that pcmcia_report_error() is a much better name for a
publicly exported function than cs_error(), but we probably cannot do much
about it at this point.
The .config file used during testing is available here:
More information about the linux-pcmcia