Inode corrupted after CVS update
Steven Scholz
steven.scholz at imc-berlin.de
Tue Apr 8 04:47:49 EDT 2003
David Woodhouse schrieb:
> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 09:33, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>>So how stable is the MTD/JFFS2 code anyway?
>>Is the CVS the only place for me to get the source?
>>Or are there some offical, release patches?
>
>
> The jffs2-2_4-branch from CVS, which is in Marcelo's latest 2.4.21-pre,
> is the one that's _really_ intended to be stable -- but that's because
> we don't make any exciting changes there at all.
But the performance improvements lately done on the JFFS2 code is in
there!?
So for production systems I should patch my 2.4.20 with the
jffs2-2_4-branch !?
> If you want to track -HEAD it's worth keeping an eye on the IRC channel
> -- if Thomas and I are spending the day discussing how best to fix
> stuff, and there's a lot of swearing and debugging going on, then it's
> probably not a good time to update :)
:o))
Thanks,
Steven
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list