Inode corrupted after CVS update

Tue Apr 8 05:08:35 EDT 2003

On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 09:47, Steven Scholz wrote:
> But the performance improvements lately done on the JFFS2 code is in 
> there!?

No. Nothing new is in there -- possibly not even the fixes to get
mtime/nlink on directories right.

> So for production systems I should patch my 2.4.20 with the 
> jffs2-2_4-branch !?

That's the official answer, yes. In practice, you'll generally be OK on
CVS head, and it hasn't had much done to it recently that's going to
make it break.

-- 
dwmw2