UnitSizeFactor of != 1 yet?
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Tue Mar 12 20:13:49 EST 2002
mark at lakeshoremicro.com said:
> Yes, that was the message I got with the latest cvs code, after
> relocating the ReplUnitTable assignment.
> Just to make sure I didn't have something else screwed up, I went back
> to the source in 2.4.18, and added a printk of the UnitSizeFactor. In
> that case, it also said 0.
Eep. OK, if you put a check in just before we deal with UnitSizeFactor,
setting it to 0xFF if it was 0x00 - does that make it work? Don't break the
memcmp with the later MediaHeader - use a local variable of something.
Vadim, is this expected? Is a UnitSizeFactor of zero _always_ going to mean
that the Virtual Unit size matches the physical unit size?
--
dwmw2
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list