block device for 2.0

[David Woodhouse]

On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Erwin Authried wrote:

> I thought it might be best to have the choice between the
> old, uncached block block driver (for uClinux) or the new driver
> as a configuration option. Are there any better ideas?

Makes sense. How about having CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK and CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RW
just like we currently have for NFTL?

-- 
dwmw2




To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org