block device for 2.0

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Erwin Authried wrote:
>
> > I thought it might be best to have the choice between the
> > old, uncached block block driver (for uClinux) or the new driver
> > as a configuration option. Are there any better ideas?
>
> Makes sense. How about having CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK and CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RW
> just like we currently have for NFTL?

Why not the other way around, i.e. CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK and CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK_RO?
The read-only one is more the "special case" than the read-write one...


Nicolas



To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org