JFFS - ready for submission into 2.?
alex at cendio.se
Thu Jun 1 13:13:06 EDT 2000
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'm fairly happy with the current state of the MTD code - my remaining
> niggles are lack of certain functionality rather than stupidities in the
> code, so I'm submitting it to Alan in the hope that he'll include it into
> his 2.4.0-test1-ac kernels - after all, it's "only new drivers."
> If I get away with that, it would be nice to get JFFS in too - Alex, is the
> code in our CVS ready for that or should we hold off for a while longer?
I will look at it tomorrow at work (Haven't had time before). All
functionallity should be implemented and work. I haven't done any larger
scale testing yet though, so it's definitely experimental. There is a bug
in the mkfs.jffs program though. It generates too big nodes (which the
jffs code can't handle) for files that are larger than 64k.
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org
More information about the linux-mtd