JFFS - ready for submission into 2.[34]?

[David Woodhouse]

alex at cendio.se said:
>  I will look at it tomorrow at work (Haven't had time before). All
> functionallity should be implemented and work. I haven't done any
> larger scale testing yet though, so it's definitely experimental.

Fine. We all know how to get larger scale testing :)

> There is a bug in the mkfs.jffs program though. It generates too big
> nodes (which the jffs code can't handle) for files that are larger
> than 64k.

I saw the dicussion about this, and was wondering why mkfs.jffs actually 
populates the filesystem at all. Is it because it's more space-efficient to 
do it all at once than it would be to mkfs, mount and populate it?


--
dwmw2




To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org