JFFS - ready for submission into 2.[34]?

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri Jun 2 04:21:43 EDT 2000

alex at cendio.se said:
>  I will look at it tomorrow at work (Haven't had time before). All
> functionallity should be implemented and work. I haven't done any
> larger scale testing yet though, so it's definitely experimental.

Fine. We all know how to get larger scale testing :)

> There is a bug in the mkfs.jffs program though. It generates too big
> nodes (which the jffs code can't handle) for files that are larger
> than 64k.

I saw the dicussion about this, and was wondering why mkfs.jffs actually 
populates the filesystem at all. Is it because it's more space-efficient to 
do it all at once than it would be to mkfs, mount and populate it?


To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo at infradead.org

More information about the linux-mtd mailing list