[GIT PULL] arm64: dts: mediatek: changes for v5.13 (second round)

[Matthias Brugger]

Hi Arnd,

On 07/04/2021 18:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:00 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Olof and Arnd,
>>
>> Here comes the second round of arm64 DT patches. Hope I'm not too late.
>> Basically we add several node to MT8167.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Fabien Parent (6):
> 
>>       arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8167: add some DRM nodes
> 
> I stumbled over this patch adding a lot of aliases:
> 
> +       aliases {
> +               aal0 = &aal;
> +               ccorr0 = &ccorr;
> +               color0 = &color;
> +               dither0 = &dither;
> +               dsi0 = &dsi;
> +               ovl0 = &ovl0;
> +               pwm0 = &disp_pwm;
> +               rdma0 = &rdma0;
> +               rdma1 = &rdma1;
> +               wdma0 = &wdma;
> +       };
> 
> 
> Something doesn't quite feel right about this, and I checked with Rob,
> who also thinks this looks wrong. I suppose we need to have a set of
> well documented alias types rather than just having drivers make up
> new ones on the spot.

These are needed in the DRM driver, see drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c

I added Chun-Kuang who is the maintainer of the driver. I think it's a good idea
to have this alias described in the binding. Maybe a good excuse to move to yaml
as well :)

> 
> I also noticed that some of the referenced nodes are missing a DT
> binding file, so those need to be added and reviewed as well.

I suppose you are talking about "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-enc-vp8". The binding
patches are in the media tree [1]. Maybe I supposed wrongly that they will land
in v5.13? Or perhaps I should have mentioned that in the pull request.

If it wasn't about this compatible and you can still remember, please let me
know so that we can fix that :)

I double checked and didn't find any missing binding. Some of them only have the
fallback binding described, maybe that's what you are referring to.

> 
> At this point, I'd prefer to drop the entire branch for v5.13 and have
> you work it out for the next release.
> 

Fair enough, pull request was quite late. I'll queue them for the next round then.

Thanks for having a look,
Matthias

[1]
https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/commit/?id=dd0008beef0dda915a255691e8b3b0527efaf1d8