[PATCH v3 0/9] add the imx8m pcie phy driver and imx8mm pcie support
Tim Harvey
tharvey at gateworks.com
Wed Oct 20 14:22:37 PDT 2021
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 7:10 PM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:53 PM
> > To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>; Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> > <kishon at ti.com>; vkoul at kernel.org; Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>;
> > galak at kernel.crashing.org; Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>;
> > linux-phy at lists.infradead.org; Device Tree Mailing List
> > <devicetree at vger.kernel.org>; Linux ARM Mailing List
> > <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; open list
> > <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; Sascha Hauer <kernel at pengutronix.de>;
> > dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] add the imx8m pcie phy driver and imx8mm pcie
> > support
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:10 PM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2021 3:59 AM
> > > > To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>; Lucas Stach
> > > > <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> > > > Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>; vkoul at kernel.org; Rob
> > > > Herring <robh at kernel.org>; galak at kernel.crashing.org; Shawn Guo
> > > > <shawnguo at kernel.org>; linux-phy at lists.infradead.org; Device Tree
> > > > Mailing List <devicetree at vger.kernel.org>; Linux ARM Mailing List
> > > > <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; open list
> > > > <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; Sascha Hauer
> > > > <kernel at pengutronix.de>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] add the imx8m pcie phy driver and imx8mm
> > > > pcie support
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:06 AM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > refer to the discussion [1] when try to enable i.MX8MM PCIe
> > > > > support, one standalone PCIe PHY driver should be seperated from
> > > > > i.MX PCIe driver when enable i.MX8MM PCIe support.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch-set adds the standalone PCIe PHY driver suport[1-5],
> > > > > and i.MX8MM PCIe support[6-9] to have whole view to review this
> > patch-set.
> > > > >
> > > > > The PCIe works on i.MX8MM EVK board based the the blkctrl power
> > > > > driver [2] and this PHY driver patch-set.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > > patc
> > > > >
> > > >
> > hwork.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pci%2Fpatch%2F20210510141509.929
> > > > 120
> > > > >
> > > >
> > -3-l.stach%40pengutronix.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Chongxing.zhu%40
> > > > nxp.c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > om%7C4e3d8ee008d94327f99108d9901634be%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd
> > > > 99c5c3016
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 35%7C0%7C0%7C637699247319711209%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
> > > > JWIjoiMC4wLj
> > > > >
> > > >
> > AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&
> > > > ;sdata=
> > > > >
> > > >
> > Z2TZCpdDUSoqrNB1X%2BXdoYNBe3dBDKUgkA4r%2F0TcdOg%3D&reser
> > > > ved=0
> > > > > [2]
> > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F
> > > > > patc
> > > > >
> > > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2Fcover%2F202109102026
> > > > 40
> > > > > .980366-1-l.stach%40pengutronix.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Chon
> > gxin
> > > > g.zhu%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > 40nxp.com%7C4e3d8ee008d94327f99108d9901634be%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> > > > fa92cd99
> > > > >
> > > >
> > c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637699247319711209%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ
> > > > sb3d8eyJWIjo
> > > > >
> > > >
> > iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C10
> > > > 00&
> > > > > ;sdata=5h%2By%2FcBW%2BjFkyplUuN1nB5%2BAFHuwCUJBqvRh1RiPY
> > Mo
> > > > %3D&rese
> > > > > rved=0
> > > > >
> > > > > Main changes v2 --> v3:
> > > > > - Regarding Lucas' comments.
> > > > > - to have a whole view to review the patches, send out the
> > > > > i.MX8MM PCIe
> > > > support too.
> > > > > - move the PHY related bits manipulations of the GPR/SRC to
> > > > > standalone
> > > > PHY driver.
> > > > > - split the dts changes to SOC and board DT, and use the enum
> > > > > instead of
> > > > raw value.
> > > > > - update the license of the dt-binding header file.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes v1 --> v2:
> > > > > - Update the license of the dt-binding header file to make the license
> > > > > compatible with dts files.
> > > > > - Fix the dt_binding_check errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml | 6
> > +++
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/fsl,imx8-pcie-phy.yaml | 79
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi |
> > 53
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi |
> > > > 46 ++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c |
> > 63
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > drivers/phy/freescale/Kconfig |
> > 9
> > > > ++++
> > > > > drivers/phy/freescale/Makefile |
> > 1
> > > > +
> > > > > drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8m-pcie.c |
> > 218
> > > >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-imx8-pcie.h |
> > 14
> > > > ++++++
> > > > > 9 files changed, 486 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > [PATCH v3 1/9] dt-bindings: phy: phy-imx8-pcie: Add binding for
> > > > > the [PATCH v3 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: add imx8 pcie phy driver
> > > > > support [PATCH v3 3/9] arm64: dts: imx8mm: add the pcie phy
> > > > > support [PATCH v3 4/9] arm64: dts: imx8mm-evk: add the pcie phy
> > > > > support [PATCH v3 5/9]
> > > > > phy: freescale: pcie: initialize the imx8 pcie [PATCH v3 6/9]
> > > > > dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add PHY phandles and name [PATCH v3 7/9]
> > > > > arm64: dts: imx8mm: add the pcie support [PATCH v3 8/9] arm64: dts:
> > > > > imx8mm-evk: add the pcie support on imx8mm [PATCH v3 9/9] PCI: imx:
> > > > > add the imx8mm pcie support
> > > >
> > > > Richard and Lucas,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your collective work on this series!
> > > >
> > > > I have imx8mm-venice boards to test this on both with and without
> > > > PCIe bridges. I've tested this on top of Shawn's imx/for-next (as
> > > > blk-ctl has been merged there) and end up hanging waiting for PHY ready
> > timeout.
> > > [Richard Zhu] Sorry to reply late. I run the tests based on pci/for-next
> > applied the blk-ctl issue by Lucas [2] in commit.
> > > Can you help to make a re-tests?
> > > As I know that the blk-ctl is not merged yet.
> > > Hi Lucas:
> > > Am I right?
> > >
> >
> > Richard,
> >
> > v5 of blk-ctl is merged into Shawn's for-next tree.
> >
> [Richard Zhu] Got that.
> Thanks.
>
> > > >
> > > > [ 1.454308] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: IO
> > > > 0x001ff80000..0x001ff8ffff -> 0x0
> > > > [ 1.466538] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: MEM
> > > > 0x0018000000..0x001fefffff -> 0x0
> > > > [ 1.476344] libphy: fec_enet_mii_bus: probed
> > > > [ 1.602631] phy phy-32f00000.pcie-phy.0: phy init failed --> -110
> > > > [ 1.608775] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Waiting for PHY ready
> > timeout!
> > > >
> > > > I can verify that imx8_pcie_phy_probe returns successfully and the
> > > > the phy node (imx6_pcie->phy) was found.
> > > >
> > > > Here is the dt change I made for the imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x board
> > > > that has no bridge:
> > > [Richard Zhu] Refer to the changes, the external OSC is used as PCIe REF
> > clock(same to EVK board design), right?
> >
> > Correct, an ext osc is used like EVK.
> >
> > I applied v5 blk-ctl and your v3 series on top of pci/next and came up with the
> > same issue. Do you have a git repo I could try to make sure I'm not missing
> > anything?
> >
> > Also, as Lucas has requested some changes do you have a v4 coming soon that
> > I should wait for to try? I believe this has something to do with the phy reset
> > where some of his changes were requested.
> [Richard Zhu] Unfortunately, I don't have personal git repo. But I think we stand on same base-line.
> I tried on Shawn's next tree with my v3 series today.
> PCIe NVME device works fine on my i.MX8MM EVK board, although there is git-am failure in the last patch when I apply the v3 series.
> Part of the logs:
> "
> root at imx8_all:~# lspci
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Synopsys, Inc. Device abcd (rev 01)
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp Device 5002
> root at imx8_all:~# uname -a
> Linux imx8_all 5.15.0-rc1-00091-g8bd7cd1cc7f0-dirty #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 20 09:22:32 CST 2021 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
> ...
> [ 1.164144] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: host bridge /soc at 0/pcie at 33800000 ranges:
> [ 1.172114] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: IO 0x001ff80000..0x001ff8ffff -> 0x0000000000
> [ 1.182447] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: MEM 0x0018000000..0x001fefffff -> 0x0018000000
> [ 1.304429] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: invalid resource
Richard,
What is this 'invalid resource' about? I see that with my downstream
IMX8MM PCIe driver as well and have been asked about it.
> [ 1.316305] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: iATU unroll: enabled
> [ 1.321799] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Detected iATU regions: 4 outbound, 4 inbound
> [ 1.429803] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Link up
> [ 1.534497] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Link up
> [ 1.538870] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Link up, Gen2
> [ 1.550364] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: Link up
> [ 1.550487] imx6q-pcie 33800000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> [ 1.565545] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> [ 1.573834] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff]
> [ 1.580055] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x18000000-0x1fefffff]
> [ 1.586968] pci 0000:00:00.0: [16c3:abcd] type 01 class 0x060400
> [ 1.592997] pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> [ 1.599282] pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
> [ 1.606033] pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
> [ 1.610053] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot D3cold
> [ 1.618206] pci 0000:01:00.0: [15b7:5002] type 00 class 0x010802
> [ 1.624293] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> [ 1.631177] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x20: [mem 0x00000000-0x000000ff 64bit]
> [ 1.638409] pci 0000:01:00.0: 4.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 5.0 GT/s PCIe x1 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8.0 GT/s PCIe x4 link)
> [ 1.664931] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x18000000-0x180fffff]
> [ 1.671745] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0x18100000-0x181fffff]
> [ 1.678634] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x18200000-0x1820ffff pref]
> [ 1.685873] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x18100000-0x18103fff 64bit]
> [ 1.693222] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0x18104000-0x181040ff 64bit]
> [ 1.700577] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
> [ 1.705814] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x18100000-0x181fffff]
> [ 1.712972] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 216
> "
> Regarding the log you pasted, it seems that the clock is not feed to PHY properly.
>
> Anyway, let's waiting for the v4 series, then make a try. Thanks for your great help to make the double tests.
>
My boards do not use CLKREQ# so I do not have that defined in pinmux
and I found that if I add MX8MM_IOMUXC_I2C4_SCL_PCIE1_CLKREQ_B PCIe
works on my board but this isn't a solution just a work-around (I have
boards that use the only two possible pins for CLKREQ as other
features).
Similarly you will find on the imx8mm-evk if you comment out the
CLKREQ (which isn't required) the imx8mmevk will end up hanging like
my boards:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
index 5ce43daa0c8b..f0023b48f475 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi
@@ -448,7 +448,9 @@
pinctrl_pcie0: pcie0grp {
fsl,pins = <
+/*
MX8MM_IOMUXC_I2C4_SCL_PCIE1_CLKREQ_B 0x61
+*/
MX8MM_IOMUXC_SAI2_RXFS_GPIO4_IO21 0x41
>;
};
I have PCIe working with a driver that I ported from NXP's kernel
which differs from your driver in that the PCIe PHY is not abstracted
to its own driver so I think this has something to do with the order
in which the phy is reset or initialized? The configuration of gpr14
bits looks correct to me.
Best regards,
Tim
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list