[PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol

Tero Kristo t-kristo at ti.com
Mon Sep 5 00:09:10 PDT 2016


On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> +
>>>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node:
>>>> +========================
>>>> +
>>>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
>>>> property.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
>>> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
>> assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
>>
>> Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
>> -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
>>
>> Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
>
> No objections, I think this is a logical move.

Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new 
version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?

-Tero




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list