[PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol
Dave Gerlach
d-gerlach at ti.com
Fri Sep 2 13:27:20 PDT 2016
On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Rob,
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> [...]
>>> +
>>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node:
>>> +========================
>>> +
>>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci" property.
>>
>> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
>> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
>>
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
> assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
>
> Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
>
> Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
No objections, I think this is a logical move.
Regards,
Dave
>
>
> ---
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list