[PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol

[Nishanth Menon]

On 09/05/2016 02:09 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> +
>>>>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node:
>>>>> +========================
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
>>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
>>>> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
>>> assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
>>>
>>> Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
>>> -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
>>>
>>> Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
>>
>> No objections, I think this is a logical move.
>
> Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new
> version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?

Just closing the loop here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/6/747 posted. 
the changes are in binding - clk driver itself should'nt by itself 
have any changes.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon