[PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add generic cpu power control functions for all exynos based SoCs

[Tomasz Figa]

On 16.05.2014 07:07, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
> 
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Abhilash,
>>
>> On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-
>>>>> pmu.h
>>>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@
>>>>>
>>>>>  #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP                              0x00000BAD
>>>>>
>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION               S5P_PMUREG(0x2000)
>>>>
>>>> This can be put in order of address.
>>> OK, will fix.
>>>>
>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr)   \
>>>>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr)))
>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr)          \
>>>>> +                     (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
>>
>> My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already
>> add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in
>> hotplug.c and platsmp.c.
>>
>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573
>>
>> So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of
>> patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped.
> 
> Patch 2 of your series does not apply on kgene's for-next or
> linux-next. Are you planning on re-sending this ?

OK, it seems like Kukjin has already applied your v6 series, so let's
drop my series for now. I'll remove patch 1 from my series and rebase it
on top of your v6.

Best regards,
Tomasz