[PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add generic cpu power control functions for all exynos based SoCs
kesavan.abhilash at gmail.com
Thu May 15 22:07:27 PDT 2014
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
> On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-
>>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@
>>>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD
>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000)
>>> This can be put in order of address.
>> OK, will fix.
>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \
>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr)))
>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \
>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
> My patches posted quite a while ago  to fix DT CPU topology already
> add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in
> hotplug.c and platsmp.c.
>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573
> So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of
> patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped.
Patch 2 of your series does not apply on kgene's for-next or
linux-next. Are you planning on re-sending this ?
> Best regards,
More information about the linux-arm-kernel