[PATCH 1/4] ARM: STi: add stid127 soc support
srinivas kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at st.com
Wed Feb 5 06:48:24 EST 2014
Hi Arnd,
On 31/01/14 20:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 31 January 2014, srinivas kandagatla wrote:
>
>>> Sorry if I missed the initial review, but can you explain
>>> why this is needed to start with?
>>
>> On ST SoCs the default value for L2 AUX_CTRL register is 0x0, so we set
>> the way-size explicit here.
>
> Unfortunately, we keep going back and forth on the L2 cache controller
> setup between "it should work automatically" and "we don't want to
> have configuration data in DT", where my personal opinion is that
> the first one is more important here.
>
> Now, there are a couple of properties that are defined in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt to let some of the
> things get set up automatically already. Can you check which bits
> are missing there, if any? Are they better described as "configuration"
> or "hardware" settings?
Currently l2cc bindings has few optional properties like.
- arm,data-latency
- arm,tag-latency
- arm,dirty-latency
- arm,filter-ranges
- interrupts :
- cache-id-part:
- wt-override:
These does not include properties to set "way-size", "associativity",
"enabling prefetching", "Prefetch drop enable", "prefetch offset",
"Double linefill" and few more in prefect control register and
aux-control register.
This is not just a issue with STi SOCs, having a quick look, I can see
that few more SOCs have similar requirements to set these properties.
We could do two things to get l2 setup automatically on STi SOCS.
1> Either define these properties case-by-case basic, which might be
useful for other SOCs too.
2> Or Add new compatible string for STi SoCs so that they can
automatically setup these values in cache-l2x0.c
Am Ok with either approaches.
Thanks,
srini
>
> Arnd
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list