[PATCH] ARM: dts: am437x-gp-evm: Boot fixes

[Dave Gerlach]

On 04/23/2014 09:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach at ti.com> [140422 12:53]:
>> On 04/22/2014 02:01 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach at ti.com> [140422 11:52]:
>>>> This patch, along with patch here [1], fixes boot for am437x-gp-evm. The
>>>> bootloader configures gpio5_7 to control the DDR3 termination regulator,
>>>> the linked patch prevents that gpio bank from being reset and losing
>>>> the previously configured state, and this patch binds the gpio to a
>>>> regulator so the kernel is aware of the state of the gpio.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg102941.html
>>>
>>> Setting up the GPIO regulator makes sense to me. But the hack in the
>>> link above is potentially a nasty time bomb for anybody trying to
>>> use GPIO bank 5 on that board.
>>>
>>> What tests have been done that the GPIO bank behaves properly when
>>> it's not reset?
>>
>> We've been using this configuration on this board for a while without any
>> apparent issues. Also, am335x-evmsk already uses the same idea for the VTT
>> regulator on board from commit 6046adb6ad701026c10adeac8d6a4138895f12e5
>> [ARM: dts: am335x-evmsk: Do not reset gpio0] and I am unaware of any issues
>> with that either.
>
> OK. Do you have other GPIOs in use as interrupts for devices in these
> banks and do they work fine?

I dont see any interrupts in use from gpio5 bank but as a quick test if 
I add ti,no-reset-on-init to gpio3 and gpio4 I see no issue with 
matrix-keypad operation which uses gpios from each of those banks.

>
> Also, can you please test to make sure this works with the most recent
> Javier's GPIO patches that had the issue of not booting on am335x-evmsk?
>

Yes, when using Javier's patches in addition to this patch [1], which 
was found to be necessary through this discussion [2], the AM437x GP EVM 
boots fine with linux-next with my regulator patch and gpio5 no reset 
patch applied.

Regards,
Dave

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4041881/
[2] http://marc.info/?t=139817273800014&r=1&w=2

> Regards,
>
> Tony
>