[PATCH] ARM: imx6: clk: i.MX6 DualLite/Solo i2c4 clock

[Shawn Guo]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:41:11PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 04/16/14 21:33, Iain Paton wrote:
> >Compared to i.MX6 Quad/Dual the CCM_CCGR1 register in the i.MX6 Solo/DualLite
> >replaces the ecspi5 clock with the i2c4 clock.
> >
> >Handle this difference using cpu_is_imx6dl().
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Iain Paton<ipaton0 at gmail.com>
> >---
> >  arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c
> >index b0e7f9d..2961b16 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c
> >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6q.c
> >@@ -352,7 +352,13 @@ static void __init imx6q_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> >  	clk[ecspi2]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi2",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 2);
> >  	clk[ecspi3]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi3",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 4);
> >  	clk[ecspi4]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi4",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 6);
> >-	clk[ecspi5]       = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi5",        "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 8);
> >+	if (cpu_is_imx6dl())
> >+		/*
> >+		 * ecspi5 is replaced with i2c4 on imx6dl&  imx6s
> >+		 */
> >+		clk[ecspi5] = imx_clk_gate2("i2c4",        "ipg_per",           base + 0x6c, 8);
> 
> Is it good enough to reuse ecspi5 enum value here or may it be
> better to introduce a new one i2c4 equal to ecspi5?

With the comment in there, it's just fine to reuse the enum, I think.

Shawn

> 
> >+	else
> >+		clk[ecspi5] = imx_clk_gate2("ecspi5",      "ecspi_root",        base + 0x6c, 8);
> >  	clk[enet]         = imx_clk_gate2("enet",          "ipg",               base + 0x6c, 10);
> >  	clk[esai]         = imx_clk_gate2("esai",          "esai_podf",         base + 0x6c, 16);
> >  	clk[gpt_ipg]      = imx_clk_gate2("gpt_ipg",       "ipg",               base + 0x6c, 20);
> 
> With best wishes,
> Vladimir
> 
>