[PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt-binding: fix GIC example
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 06:20:47 PDT 2014
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 10:21 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote:
>> > From: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
>> >
>> > When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells +
>>
>> Plus what? You mean ", and "?
>>
> Urgh, I obviously messed this up while editing the commit message in the
> last minute. It should have been something along the lines of:
>
> When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells +
> #interrupt-cells. address-cells should be 0 as this offset is not used
> in the GIC.
>
> As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the
> property, simply remove it.
>
> Can you edit this while applying, or should I send a new patch?
I'll fix it up and apply.
>
>> > address-cells should be 0 as this is not used.
>> >
>> > As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the
>> > property, simply remove it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
>>
>> Did this get applied? I can't seem to find patch 2.
>>
> As Shawn pointed out patch 2 got applied through the imx tree as it
> fixes a real bug there.
It was highlighted that other instances beyond iMX were wrong. Please
fix those as well.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list