[PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt-binding: fix GIC example
Lucas Stach
l.stach at pengutronix.de
Fri Apr 11 03:10:12 PDT 2014
Hi Rob,
Am Donnerstag, den 10.04.2014, 10:21 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > From: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
> >
> > When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells +
>
> Plus what? You mean ", and "?
>
Urgh, I obviously messed this up while editing the commit message in the
last minute. It should have been something along the lines of:
When using interrupt-maps, the size of a map entry is #address-cells +
#interrupt-cells. address-cells should be 0 as this offset is not used
in the GIC.
As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the
property, simply remove it.
Can you edit this while applying, or should I send a new patch?
> > address-cells should be 0 as this is not used.
> >
> > As #address-cells = <0> is the same as not specifying the
> > property, simply remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
>
> Did this get applied? I can't seem to find patch 2.
>
As Shawn pointed out patch 2 got applied through the imx tree as it
fixes a real bug there.
Regards,
Lucas
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list