imprecise external abort using the flexcan driver on i.MX6Q

Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Thu Sep 26 12:24:30 EDT 2013


On Thursday 26 September 2013 11:54 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 05:42:53PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 09/26/2013 04:01 PM, =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?= wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> when enabling the can interface with 'ifconfig can0 up' (after
>>> configuring the bitrate with canconfig) on an i.MX6Q board (TX6) I'm
>>> getting the following kernel dump:
>>>
>>> |flexcan 2094000.flexcan can0: writing ctrl=0x0a212003
>>> |flexcan 2094000.flexcan can0: flexcan_set_bittiming: mcr=0x5980000f ctrl=0x0a212003
>>> |flexcan 2094000.flexcan can0: flexcan_chip_start: writing mcr=0x79a2020f
>>> |flexcan 2094000.flexcan can0: flexcan_chip_start: writing ctrl=0x0a21ac53
>>> |Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1c06) at 0x00057adc
>>
>> Looks like a NULL pointer deref to me. But it doesn't make any sense,
>> because the offset is way beyond the length of the struct flexcan_regs.
> 
> NULL pointer derefs don't produce imprecise external aborts.  I believe
> that the FAR is unpredictable for such aborts as well, which means the
> "at xxxx" should be ignored.
> 
yep .. FAR is never reliable for imprecise external aborts.

> Bearing in mind that it is imprecise, that means that the abort happened
> sometime in the past, so the PC isn't reliable either.
> 
> The code here is:
> 
>    0:	f57ff04e 	dsb	st
>    4:	e3a01000 	mov	r1, #0
>    8:	e5820000 	str	r0, [r2]
>    c:	f57ff04e 	dsb	st
>   10:	e5820004 	str	r0, [r2, #4]
> 
> Given the dsbs there, it's probably the str r0, [r2] which provoked it,
> and we can see from the register dump, r2 is not NULL.
> 
> It's probably complaining that a clock necessary for the peripherals
> registers to be accessible is not running.
> 
Not sure if it helps but almost 90% of the imprecise external aborts
cases I have seen on OMAP attributed to clock not being available
at the IP register accesses race conditions either at SW or
hardware(clock settling time). And rest of the 10 % majority falling
into interconnect synchronization issues.

Regards,
Santosh



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list