[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: shmobile: BOCK-W reference: add Ether PFC settings

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:14:28PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 09-09-2013 11:05, Magnus Damm wrote:
> 
> >>Add the Ether pin group to bockw_pinctrl_map[].
> 
> >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com>
> 
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c |    3 +++
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>Index: renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- renesas.orig/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
> >>+++ renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
> >>@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> >>   */
> >>
> >>  static const struct pinctrl_map bockw_pinctrl_map[] = {
> >>+       /* Ether */
> >>+       PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("fde00000.ethernet", "pfc-r8a7778",
> >>+                                 "ether_rmii", "ether"),
> >>         /* SCIF0 */
> >>         PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("sh-sci.0", "pfc-r8a7778",
> >>                                   "scif0_data_a", "scif0"),
> 
> >Hi Sergei,
> 
> >Thanks for your patches. In general I think your series looks fine. I
> >have a single comment, and that's about the pinctrl-related hunk
> >above. I can see that this patch is for DT reference for Bock-W, so I
> >expect the code to be in DT. Do you have any plans to use DT to
> >describe the pinmux bits? Perhaps you have some incremental patch
> >planned?
> 
>    No, I just repeated what I saw mechanically. Now I'm seeing some
> evidence that PFC driver supports the device tree, so I probably
> need to redo the patchset... let me study this question better.

Ping.