[PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: shmobile: BOCK-W reference: add Ether PFC settings
Sergei Shtylyov
sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Wed Sep 11 08:14:28 EDT 2013
Hello.
On 09-09-2013 11:05, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> Add the Ether pin group to bockw_pinctrl_map[].
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- renesas.orig/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
>> +++ renesas/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-bockw-reference.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
>> */
>>
>> static const struct pinctrl_map bockw_pinctrl_map[] = {
>> + /* Ether */
>> + PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("fde00000.ethernet", "pfc-r8a7778",
>> + "ether_rmii", "ether"),
>> /* SCIF0 */
>> PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_DEFAULT("sh-sci.0", "pfc-r8a7778",
>> "scif0_data_a", "scif0"),
> Hi Sergei,
> Thanks for your patches. In general I think your series looks fine. I
> have a single comment, and that's about the pinctrl-related hunk
> above. I can see that this patch is for DT reference for Bock-W, so I
> expect the code to be in DT. Do you have any plans to use DT to
> describe the pinmux bits? Perhaps you have some incremental patch
> planned?
No, I just repeated what I saw mechanically. Now I'm seeing some evidence
that PFC driver supports the device tree, so I probably need to redo the
patchset... let me study this question better.
> Cheers,
> / magnus
WBR, Sergei
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list